FORMAT FILE

AI voice: not banned — but it stacks the deck against you

No line in the policy bans AI voices. What the policy judges is authorship and originality — and a synthetic voice removes the clearest authorship signal while usually arriving with the template structure the inauthentic-content policy targets. The risk is real but it is a stack of signals, not a single rule, which is why the honest answer is a score, not a slogan. Run yours on the risk checker.

Where this format gets rejected

• AI persona presenting as an expert — the policy names AI personas presenting as experts on health, legal, finance, and politics as not allowed; an AI health channel with 993K views was rejected in October 2026.
• Generic templates plus synthetic narration plus stock visuals is the mass-production silhouette, all three signals at once.
• Accepted-then-removed is a real path: an AI story channel entered the Partner Program on September 22, 2026 and was demonetized nine days later.

The fixes that move the score

• ✓ If the voice is synthetic, over-invest everywhere else: original research, your own examples, visible editorial choices per video.
• ✓ Never let an AI persona pose as a credentialed expert. Present as a named researcher or change the format.
• ✓ Consider your own voice for at least the framing segments — it changes what a reviewer can clearly tell about who made the channel.

Score your own channel free on the risk checker — eight questions, a band, and your ranked fixes with the policy lines attached.